REN FUCOLLECTIONS DO NOT FORCE ANYBODY TO BELIEVE OR STUDY OR EVEN TO LOOK AT OURPOSTINGS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. PEOPLE CANBELIEVE WHAT THEY WANT :THEY DO NOT NEED TO STUDY OUR ARCHAEOLOGICALLYEXCAVATED ZISHAHUS OR SANTOH HUS IF THEY THINK THEY ARE TOO CLEVER OR KNOWEVERYTHING ABOUT PRE-DAOGUANG TEAPOTS. TAKE THESETWO ALADDIN LAMP-SHAPED TEAPOTS FOR EXAMPLE(SEE PICTURES).CERTAIN PEOPLE KEEPINSISTING THEY ARE DAOGUANG AND SAY WE SUSPICIOUSLY ADJUST THE PERIOD TO SUITOUR POTS(MOST OF THESE PEOPLE SELL FAKE ZISHAHUS AND ARE TROUBLE MAKERS) OURARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ,MOST OF THE TIME,VERY EXACT WITH MOST OF OUREXCAVATED POTS COMING FROM TOMBS OR GRAVES WITH NIAN DAI(YEAR OF EMPEROR’SREIGN) INSCRIBED ON THE TOMBSTONE ORGRAVESTONE EPITAPH. THESE TWOALADDIN LAMP SHAPED POTS NOT ONLY HAVE QIAN LONG REIGN MARK BUT HAVE NIAN DAIWRITTEN ON THE TOMBSTONE EPITAPH. SO WITHSUCH OVERWHELMING PROOFS ,IF THEY KEEP SAYING WE ALTERED THE PERIOD ,THEN WEADVISE THESE TROUBLE MAKERS NOT TO WASTETHEIR TIME ON OUR POSTINGS. THESETROUBLE MAKERS (WHO DO NOT WANT PEOPLETO LEARN BECAUSE IT THREATEN THEIR RICEBOWL…”SELLING FAKE ZISHAHUS”) ARE ANOTHER REASON WHY WE SHOW HUMAN BONES- SO ASTO SHOW THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF PROOFS. ENJOY TOO THEPAN HU WE POSTED! REN FU COLLECTIONS INVENTORYSHEET
1) OBJECT TYPE : YIXING TEAPOT
2) INVENTORY NO: 8
3) DESCRIPTION: GUANG HUO
4) PERIOD/DATE data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fd49/9fd4936f00e17962b776624e64e55e44125e290c" alt="" IAN LONG
5) PLACE OF ORIGIN: YIXING CHINA.
6) ARTIST/MAKER data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b429b/b429b84a8c8b5bd65c6548779c10d7ed35a1efef" alt="" AN HU
7) MATERIAL: PURPLE CLAY
8) FINDSPOT: CLASIIFIED
9) FINDDATE: CLASSIFIED
10) DIMENSIONS: HT.:6.0CM. L:11.8CM.
11) BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES: NONE
12) ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMMENT:TO BE UPDATED
13) EXPERT COMMENT: ALMOST EVERY EXPERT WRONGLY THINK IT IS DAOGUANG . 任富收藏从不强迫任何人去观看,学习及相信我们的文章。 人们可以相信他们所信仰的:他们并不需要去学习我们的紫砂壶或汕头壶的考古出土资料,倘若他们认为自己很聪明,并且知道所有事情关于道光前的茶壶。 他们坚持自己的壶是道光时期的,也说我们令人怀疑地调整时期来合适自己的壶。(大多数这些人都是卖假壶之人及是麻烦制造者) 大多数的时间,我们的考古材料与从坟墓出土的壶都拥有很精准的年代(依据皇帝统治的年代)显示于墓志铭。 这两个阿拉丁神灯款壶不只是有乾隆年代的印款,同时也有墓志铭上的年代。 所以像这样势不可挡的证据,如果他们继续说,我们改变了时期,则我们建议这些麻烦制造者不要浪费自己的时间在我们的帖子上。 这些麻烦制造者(就是那些人不想让别人学习,因为这些威胁到那些“卖假壶之人”的饭碗),这也是为什么我们展示人的骨头,以证明我们拥有足够的证据。 观赏这章潘壶的文章! 任富收藏的考古记录:
宝物类型:宜兴茶壶
编号:8
描述:光货
年代:乾隆时期
生产起源:中国宜兴
名家作者:潘壶
原料:紫泥
找到的地方:机密
找到的时间:机密
尺寸:高度:6.0cm; 长度 :11.8cm
文献证明书:无
考古的评论:将会更新
专家的评论:大部分专家错认为是道光时期的。
|