陈鸣远壶证明他喜欢做这种造型……

任富收藏

THESE POTS CLEARLY INDICATE CHEN MING YUAN LIKE TO MAKE THISKIND OF SHAPE…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

THESE  ZISHAHU WEREARCHAEOLOGICALLY EXCAVATED ……..YOU MIGHT SAY,ITS NOT A BIG DEAL!

THESE ZISHAHUS ARE ARCHAEOLOGICALLY EXCAVATED CHEN MING YUANZISHAHUS…..YOU CAN SAY IT’S A BIG DEAL BECAUSE REN FU COLLECTIONS ‘CHEN MINGYUAN ZISHAHUS ARE THE ONLY ARCHAEOLOGICALLY EXCAVATED  CHEN MING YUAN ZISHAHUS IN THE WORLD.(WE HAVETOMBSTONES EPITAPHS,HUMAN BONES,COFFIN WOODS,BURNERS’ CHARCOAL,TEA LEAVES ANDEVEN YEAR-DATED COINS TO PROVE AND EVEN BE ISSUED LEGAL CERTIFICATE OFAUTHENTICITY)

NOW THIS IS THE BIGGEST DEAL WHEN THESE TWO CHEN MING YUANPOTS PROVE,BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT,THAT CHEN MING YUAN LIKED TO MAKE THISKIND OF SHAPE OF POT.(PLUS A FEW OTHER KIND OF SHAPES)

WE DO NOT HAVE PROOFS THAT THESE POTS WERE MADE BY CHEN MINGYUAN BUT THESE POTS PROVED CHEN MING YUAN MADE THESE SHAPES. WE BELIEVE THESEPOTS WERE EARLY QING IMITATIONS BECAUSE AN ARCHAEOLOGIST WHO EXCAVATED THESEPOTS CAN FEEL AND PICTURE THE ORIGINAL PERSON WHO OWNED THESE POTS LIKE THEIRWEALTH,POWER,INFLUENCE.ETC.

NEXT WEEK,WE HAVE A REAL STORY SHOWING YOU A POT EXCAVATEDFROM A KANGXI 28TH YEAR REIGN TOMB THAT REN FU COLLECTIONS ARE VERYSURE IS THE POT MADE BY CHEN MING YUAN.  

NOW,YOU LEARNING PUBLIC OUT THERE:IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTANDTHIS FACT –THEN CHEN MING YUAN’S LEGACY IS DEAD,BURIED BY NEW AND OLD FAKES..YOU CAN SAY CHEN MING YUAN WILL TURN IN HIS GRAVE , KNOWING THE FRAUDSTERSAND FAKERS HAVE DESTROYED HIS NAME.

THE SHAPES OF THE CHEN MING YUAN POTS IN THE MARKET ARE SORIDICULOUS THAT THEY DROVE  ANEX-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF A TAIWANESE NEWSPAPER TO WRITE ,A FEW YEARS AGO,ATHIRTEEN PAGE THESIS ATTACKING THE AUTHENTICITYOF THOSE UNPROVEN CHEN MING YUANPOTS WITH SUSPICIOUS  SHAPES..IN DUECOURSE SUGGESTING SOME ARE LATE QING IMITATIONS AT BEST.

OF COURSE,YOU ,AND ESPECIALLY THE FRAUDSTERS,MIGHT SAYTHAT,THAT PERSON ,WHO WAS AN EX-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF A TAIWAN NEWSPAPER AND WHOWROTE A PREVIEW FOR A SOTHEBYS’ ZISHAHU AUCTION IN 1997,WAS JUST EXPRESSING HISOPINION AND COULD BE WRONG.

YES,YOU COULD BE RIGHT,IF YOU SAY THAT BEFORE REN FUCOLLECTIONS CAME ONTO THE SCENE.

BUT NO,NOT NOW..YOU ARE WRONG BECAUSE REN FU COLLECTIONS HAVEARCHAEOLOGICAL PROOFS THAT CHEN MING YUAN WAS NOT SO PROLIFIC IN CREATING SOVERY MANY DIFFERENT SHAPES OF POT,ESPECIALLY SOPHISTICATED SHAPES OF POTS WHICHBEGAN TO APPEAR IN LATE QING..SO THOSE CHEN MING YUAN POTS IN THE MARKET ARELATE QING OLD  FAKES AND MODERN FAKES.

WHY?

BECAUSE …HOW COME  INREN FU COLLECTIONS’ THOUSANDS OF POTS(WE HAVE SEEN THE YET UNDISCLOSED  SECOND AND THIRD THOUSANDS POTS) THERE IS NOTONE POT SIMILAR ,WE REPEAT,THERE IS NOT ONE POT SIMILAR TO THOSE POTS WITHTHOSE SHAPES?

WHATSMORE REN FU COLLECTIONS ARCHAEOLOGICALLY EXCAVATED CHENMING YUAN POTS BELONGED TO MAINLAND CHINESE PEOPLE WHO PLY THE MARITIME SILKROUTE COUNTRIES  AND NOT POTS SOLD TOKOREANS,JAPANESE,VIETNAMESE,THAIS.,WESTERNERS...AND WHAT HAVE YOU!

IN BOOKS ,ZISHAHU EXPERTS OFTEN SAID,”CHEN MING YUAN WASFAMOUS OVERSEAS!”.

AND THESE MAINLAND CHINESE ,MOSTLY NAN FANG OR SOUTHERNCHINESE,KNEW MORE ABOUT TEA AND YIXING TEAPOTS THAN ANYONE IN THE WORLD AT THATTIME.

LIKE AN EUROPEAN ART HISTORIAN AND ART AUTHENTICATION FRIENDOF THE BOSS OF REN FU COLLECTIONS SAID BEFORE,”THE CHINESE ARE VERY INTELLIGENTPEOPLE.NOBODY IN THE WORLD CAN FOOL OR CHEAT THE CHINESE UNLESS ITS BYTHEIR  OWN CHINESE PEOPLE!”

WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT THOSE SHAPES OF CHEN MING YUAN POTS INTHE MARKET ARE OBVIOUSLY FAKES OR OLD FAKES NOW THAT YOU HAVE  ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROOFS FROM REN FUCOLLECTIONS.

ENJOY THE COMPARISON OF GENUINE EARLY QING  CHEN MING YUAN  ZISHAHU SHAPES AND FAKE CHEN MING YUANZISHAHU SHAPES.

P/S…THE TWO RECENT BIG AUCTION PRICES FOR CHEN MING YUANPOTS ARE REASONS WHY EVEN THE WELL-KNOWN SCHOLAR HUANG QIAN LIANG ,LET ALONEOTHER FRAUDSTERS,ARE SO TEMPTED BY THE BIG MONEY IN FAKES,TO JOIN IN THECORRUPTED AND FRAUDULENT BUSINESS OF CHEN MING YUAN ZISHAHU.

FORGET ABOUT WHETHER THE POTS IN THE MARKET, ARE CHEN MINGYUAN OR NOT…HOW CAN THOSE POTS BE CHEN MING YUAN WHEN THEY ARE NOT EVEN KANGXI,WHENCHEN MING YUAN WAS STARTING OUT, OR QIAN LONG WHEN HE PRESUMABLY RETIRED.

LIKE SHI DABIN ,HUI MENG CHEN,HUI YI GONG,SITING,JUNDE,YUCHEN..ETC..CHEN MING YUAN DID NOT HAVE THE LATE QING’S SOPHISTICATED MIND ORHINDSIGHT TO DO SO MANY DIFFERENT SHAPES OR STYLE.

ARTISTS ARE CREATURES OF HABIT AND STYLE…WITNESS PICASSO,QIBAISHI OR EVEN THE MOST LATEST OF ARTIST …THE HARRY POTTER WRITER,J.W.ROWLING,WHO FINDS IT DIFFICULT TO CHANGE STYLE OR GENRE  FROM WHAT SHE WAS USED TO.

这些考古发掘的陈鸣远壶证明他喜欢做这种造型……………..

这些紫砂壶进行考古发掘的........你可能会说，没什么大不了的！

这些考古发掘的陈鸣远紫砂壶，可以说它是一个大问题，因为任富收藏是唯一的考古发掘陈鸣远紫砂壶在世界上（除了福建漳浦县出土于乾隆23年陈鸣远朱泥壶外）。（我们有墓碑的墓志铭，人的骨头、棺木、炉炭、茶叶、甚至硬币，可以拿到发布的真实合法证书）

现在，你可以讲这是很大事，这几把考古发掘出来的壶证明他喜欢做的造型。

我们没有证据证明这些是由陈鸣远本人做的，但这些壶证明陈鸣远喜欢做的造型。我们相信这些壶是清初仿制品因为考古学家发掘这些壶的，可以从考古发掘的经验说出这些壶的墓主人是有钱的、有权利、有影响力的人，紫砂专家没有这个本事感觉和看出来的。

下个星期，我们有一个真实的故事告诉你一把鸣远壶从康熙二十八年的墓发掘，任富收藏非常肯定是陈鸣远做的。

现在，你学习公众那里：如果你不了解这个事实，陈鸣远的遗物就是死了，新仿和老仿埋起来了....你可以说陈鸣远在他的坟墓会跳，知道骗子们已经摧毁他的名。

几年前有一个台湾报纸的编辑写的关于陈鸣远的13篇论文，来讲在市场上的陈鸣远紫砂壶的造型是那么的荒谬，是不对的，那些没有证据的陈鸣远紫砂壶在市场形状可疑，不管是清晚期的仿造也是可疑的！

当然，你们可以讲13篇论文是错误的，是骗子，可以说，这位台湾报纸的总编辑是想象出来的，只是表达了他的观点，可能是错误的，因为他没有任何证据。

是的，你说的对，是他没有证据，因为任富收藏还没进去紫砂古壶世界。

但是，不，不是现在。你错了，因为任富收藏有考古证明，陈鸣远不是制作创造如此多的不同造型，特别是紫砂壶造型，那样的壶出现于晚清时期老仿和现代复杂的形状新仿。

为什么？

因为……如何在任富收藏成千上万发掘的壶（我们已经看到尚未公开第二和第三千个壶）没有一个壶类似，我们重复，没有一个壶类似于那些形状的壶（如青铜器或花生）。

其次，任富收藏考古发掘的陈鸣远款紫砂壶，是中国人带过来“海上丝绸之路“的国家，而不是卖给外国人使用的，如韩国，日本，越南，泰国，西方人…和什么！

在书中，紫砂壶专家经常说，“陈鸣远是海外有名的！“。

这些大陆的中国人，大多是中国南方人，知道更多关于茶和宜兴紫砂壶，比当时世界上的任何人。

像一个欧洲艺术历史鉴定家，和任富收藏的老板是好朋友，曾经说：“中国人是很聪明的，没有人骗他们，除了他们自己骗自己中国人”。

它的意思是，那些造型是很容易看是晚清时期仿陈鸣远款的壶，或者是新仿假壶。假如你拿任富收藏的考古发掘的鸣远款紫砂壶来比较真实性的造型，和仿造的区别。

享受真正的清早期的陈鸣远的造型和假壶的造型！

P / S。最近两大拍卖会关于陈鸣远的紫砂壶，一个拍3000多万，一个1000多万，价格是真的理由，为什么出名的黄健亮也参与，更别说其他的骗子，为到赚大钱搞仿壶，不要好好真的教人学习。

我们不要讲在市场上的壶是不是陈鸣远的，因为他的造型很奇特，这样的壶哪里是陈鸣远的，不是康熙，那时陈鸣远刚开始做壶，乾隆时期就要退休了。

我们的考古科学眼睛方法，不可以看到几百年的钙和腐蚀，像时大彬，惠孟臣，惠逸公，陆思亭，玉珍，君德等等名家做一种造型的风格，陈鸣远没有这样的造型和老练的头脑来做这样的造型和风格。

艺术家是喜欢做习惯的造型和风格…就像你们看见的毕加索、齐白石甚至最新的艺术家…还有最近的作家哈利·波特，J.W.ROWLING，谁发现很难改变风格或流派，各有特点，不简单。