了解放射性碳的断代

任富收藏 · 发表于 2017-2-22 17:27:01

REN FU COLLECTIONS CAN DO CARBON-DATING ON HUMAN BONES,COFFIN WOOD,BURNER’S CHARCOAL AND TEA LEAVES TO GET A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY FOR THE POT…………..
IN A VERY CORRUPT AND FRAUDULENT ZISHAHU WORLD WHERE THERE ARE FRAUDSTERS IN INSTITUTIONS AND LOTS OF PEOPLE SELLING FAKE ZISHAHUS…AN EFFORT TO TELL THE TRUTH IS NOT ENOUGH;YOU HAVE TO MAKE A SUPREME EFFORT.
WHY THE GIGANTIC /SUPREME EFFORT TO TELL THE TRUTH?
BECAUSE WHEN YOU ARE ALONE FIGHTING FOR THE TRUTH IN A ZISHAHU WORLD WITH SO MANY FRAUDSTERS,YOU MUST HAVE ABSOLUTE PROOFS.THESE PROOFS ARE THE FORCES OF TRUTH THAT CAN DEFEAT THE FRAUDSTERS AND FAKERS.
AND ONE OF THE FORCES OF TRUTH COMES IN THE FORM OF CARBON-DATING.
WHY,YOU ASK,DO WE NEED CARBON-DATING  WHEN REN FU COLLECTIONS HAVE TOMBSTONE EPITAPHS TO PROVE THE NIANDE OF THE POTS?
GOOD QUESTION!
BUT,FIRST LET US EXPLAIN WHAT IS CARBON-DATING AND WHAT CAN BE CARBON-DATED.
ACCORDING TO RAFTER RADIOCARBON LABORATORY,BASED IN NEW ZEALAND,”RADIOCARBON(C14) DATING IS USED TO DETERMINE THE AGE OF AN OBJECT OR MATERIAL CONTAINING ORGANIC CARBON BY MEASURING THE PROPORTION OF CARBON 14 IT CONTAIN.
IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE CARBON IN THE MATERIAL WAS ASSIMILATED FROM THE ENVIRONMENT WHILE THE ORGANISM THAT GIVE RISE TO THE MATERIAL WAS ALIVE AND THE PROPORTION OF THE THREE ISOTOPES OF CARBON INSIDE REMAINS THE SAME. ONCE THE ORGANISM DIES,THE AMOUNT OF C 14 SLOWLY DECREASES AT A  KNOWN RATE(RADIOACTIVE DECAY) RELATIVE TO THE NON-RADIOACTIVE OR STABLE ISOTOPES OF CARBON IN THE MATERIAL.
RADIOCARBON DATING AN OBJECTIVE METHOD OF DETERMINING TIME RANGES WITHIN WHICH AN OBJECT MAY BE PLACED.SINCE IT DATES THE MATERIAL AND NOT NECESSARILY THE PROCESS  THAT THE MATERIAL MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO,THAT IS,CARVING IN THE CASE OF WOOD,WEAVING IN THE CASE OF YTEXTILES, THE AGE MEASURED MUST BE INTERPRETED  IN LIGHT OF  ALL AVAILABLE EVIDENCE TO DETERMINE AUTHENTICITY.”.(SORRY,IT GIVES ME A HEADACHE TOO READING THIS LONG NARRATIVE)

AND WHAT CAN BE RADIOCARBON?
ANY OBJECT MADE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL WHICH CONTAINS CARBON SUCH AS WOOD,TEXTILES,IVORY,BONE,LACQUER AND PAPER CAN BE TESTED.(TEA LEAVES TOO)
AND THIS MEANS,INDIRECTLY,THE AGE OF THE WOOD,BONE,CHARCOAL,TEA LEAVES ARE THE AGE OF THE POT.
SO A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY CAN BE PRODUCED FOR THE POT.
NOW,TO YOUR GOOD QUESTION:WHY DO REN FU COLLECTIONS NEED CARBON-DATING WHEN WE HAVE TOMBSTONE EPITAPHS TO PROVE THE NIANDE OF THE POTS?
BECAUSE FRAUDSTER (AND FAKERS)ESPECIALLY SYNDICATED INSTITUTIONAL FRAUDSTERS ARE VERY SKILFUL AND INTELLIGENT AT DECEIVING PEOPLE:THEY MIGHT SAY OUR TOMBSTONE EPITAPHS AND POTS ARE MATCHED..THEY ,TO CAUSE CONFUSION, MIGHT SAY THE POT DID NOT COME FROM THE TOMB.
FOR EXAMPLE THE TAIWANESE FRAUDSTER,A DOG OF THE GANG OF THREE, CHEN TIAN LONG-ACCUSED REN FU COLLECTIONS OF ALTERING THE NIANDE OF THE ,DAOGUANG HE CLAIMED,BALL-SHAPED ZISHAHUS TO JIAQING AND QIAN LONG PERIOD…AND ALSO ACCUSED US THE SAME ABOUT THE ,DAOGUANG HE BELIEVED, PAN-HU WHICH WE SAID ITS QIAN LONG PERIOD.(THIS DOG WITH HIS TAIL BETWEEN HIS LEGS,CHEN TIAN LONG,IS NOWHERE TO BE SEEN NOW  BECAUSE HE HAS LOST FACE WHEN WE PROVIDED THE PROOFS)
BUT THE SKILFUL AND SMART ONE IS AN INSTITUTIONAL FRAUDSTER WHO ATTACKED THE CREDITABITLITY OF REN FU COLLECTIONS ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS.HE IS HUANG QIAN LIANG WHO SAID OUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS WERE NOT GOVERNMENT-LINKED AND SO OUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIAL CANNOT BE USED.(NONSENSE THERE ARE PRIVATE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS THAT WE HAVE PROVEN LIKE PRE-CONSTRUCT ARCHAEOLOGY BASED IN LONDON)
AND THE  BRUSSELS ART LABORATORY SAID REN FU COLLECTIONS ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIAL ARE GENUINE AND CAN BE PROVEN.
SO WHO IS RIGHT?..HUANG QIAN LIANG,THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAUDSTER OR THE SCIENTIST OF BRUSSELS ART LABORATORY?
ENJOY REN FU COLLECTIONS ARCHAEOLOGICAL POSTING.
P/S…BRUSSELS ART LABORATORY IMPLIED THAT ITS WRONG THAT HUANG QIAN LIANG ISSUED CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY BASED ON FEELING AND EXPERIENCE .
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY SHOULD BE BASE3D ON SCIENTIFIC  OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROOF.
IN ANOTHER POSTING,WE WILL GIVE YOU PROOFS THAT THE GANG OF THREE ,THROUGH THEIR DOGS(READ SMALL FRAUDSTERS) ,TRY TO PREVENT THE SALES OF REN FU COLLECTIONS’ BOOKS AND PREVENT PEOPLE LEARNING FROM REN FU COLLECTIONS BECAUSE THEY FEARED FOR THEIR “RICE BOWLS”.
FU COLLECTIONS INVENTORY SHEET
1) OBJECT TYPE : YIXING TEAPOT
2) INVENTORY NO: 312
3) DESCRIPTION: GUANG HUO
4) PERIOD/DATE ：REFER TO YIXING WARES OF EARLY QING DYNASTY FOUND IN NANYANG
5) PLACE OF ORIGIN: YIXING CHINA.
6) ARTIST/MAKER: UNKNOWN
7) MATERIAL: PURPLE CLAY
8) FINDSPOT: CLASSIFIED
9) FINDDATE: CLASSIFIED
10) DIMENSIONS: HT-REFER TO YIXING WARES OF EARLY QING DYNASTY FOUND IN NANYANG
11) BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES: REFER TO YIXING WARES OF EARLY QING DYNASTY FOUND IN NANYANG
12) ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMMENT: REFER TO WEBSITE
13)EXPERT COMMENT: REFER TO WEBSITE
任富收藏可以做放射性碳断代（carbon-dating）对人体骨骼、棺木、煤炭和茶叶得到一把壶鉴定证书..............
在一个腐败和欺诈的紫砂壶的世界里，不管是小骗子还是公共机构的大骗子售卖假壶，来出一个力气来讲一个真实的，还不够:必须要出一个最大努力来讲真实的。
为什么要说真话？
因为当你独自战斗在紫砂壶的世界里面，真有这么多的骗子，你必须有绝对的百分之一百的证据，这些证明真理的力量能够战胜骗子和骗子仿壶的人（骗子不需要有证据他的话就可以骗人了）。
一个真理的证据力量来自于放射性碳断代来对付骗子。
为什么，你问？我们是否需要放射性碳断代（carbon-dating），任富收藏都有墓碑的墓志铭证明壶的年代了？
问的好！
但是，首先让我们解释什么是放射性碳断代（carbon-dating），什么东西可以用来放射性碳断代？
根据拉夫特放射性碳实验室，总部在新西兰皇家地质与核科学研究所之所属单位，同时也是纽西兰之首位地质和同位素研究室。“放射性碳（C14）断代是利用一件器物或材料内所含有的有机物碳，测量碳中的碳同位素碳14的比例来断代一件器物的年代。
据推测，其原理建立在以下两个假设之上：
第一，       一件由有机材料造成的器物，内里所含的碳，是摄取于这些有机物还活着的自然环境；
第二，       碳里面之三个同位素之比例尚未改变。
一旦生物体终止生命，其其中所含有的放射性碳14（C 14）的数量，会以一定的可测量的速度，因应器物内非放射性或稳定的同位素碳量而逐渐减少，既是所谓的放射性碳衰退。
放射性碳断代利用一个客观的方法来断定器物之年代。它可断代器物材料，但不一定断代器物之制作过程，比如木材的雕刻，或是纺织品的编织。年龄的推断必须根据所有能获得的证据，才可确定真伪。测量一件器物碳14的衰退速度即可断定此器物的年代。（抱歉，我让你头痛读这本长篇叙事）。
什么东西适用于放射性碳断代？
任何有机材料做成的并含有碳的器物，如木材，纺织品，象牙制品，骨制品，漆器和纸张制成的有机材料均可以用放射性碳断代测试（茶叶也可以）。
这意味着，间接地证据如棺木材，骨骼，木炭，茶叶的年龄是壶的年代。
因此，这个新西兰的鉴定家讲你的壶可以出一张真实的鉴定书。
现在，你的好问题：为什么任富收藏需要做放射性碳断代（carbon-dating），已有墓碑墓志铭证明壶年代了？
因为骗子（和骗子售卖仿壶）很聪明的骗你们讲我们的墓标不是真的，是配的，简单讲骗子们要做你混乱，可以说壶不是来自坟墓。
例如，我们说台湾的骗子，三人帮的狗其中一个是陈天龙（网名：御宝轩茶坊），他每次讲任富收藏改变壶的年代，他讲球形壶是道光，我们记载是乾隆和嘉庆时期的，还骂我们故意改变年代。又讲潘壶是道光时期，不是乾隆时期出土的，他故意这样讲做你们乱（因为他在网络卖假壶骗大陆人售卖假壶，现在陈天龙这只三人帮的狗他的尾巴夹在两腿之间了，没有脸面了，不敢来讲了。因为我们出来很多证据。）
但是最高技术的熟练的和聪明的人是一个公共机构的大骗子攻击任富收藏考古有问题，因为他不要让人跟着任富收藏学习。他是黄健亮，他讲我们的考古发掘不是政府的，因为这样我们的考古资料不可以使用。（废话，我们已经证明，像pre-construct基于考古家在伦敦有私人的考古发掘）。
和欧洲的艺术科学鉴定家布鲁塞尔艺术实验室说：“任富收藏考古材料是真实的，可以用来做证明。”
那么谁是对的？你们相信黄健亮这个公共机构的大骗子，还是这位欧洲的艺术科学鉴定家？
享受任富收藏的考古贴文。
P/S：欧洲的布鲁塞尔艺术实验室暗示了黄健亮的猜测没有证据的，不真实的。（假的，错误的证书）
证书必须要有科学的和真实性应有的考古证据。
下一个贴文是讲三人班和他的狗（小骗子），不要你买任富收藏的书和学习，因为他们怕他的晚饭没有了。
(1)宝物类型：宜兴茶壶
(2)编号： 312
(3)描述：光货
(4)年代：参考《海丝茶烟》书籍
(5)生产起源：中国宜兴
(6)名家作者：无
(7)原料：紫砂
(8)找到的地方：机密
(9)找到的时间：机密
(10)尺寸：参考《海丝茶烟》书籍
(11)文献证明书：参考《海丝茶烟》书籍
(12)考古的评论：看网址更新
(13)专家的评论：看网址更新