463号乾隆年制

任富收藏

Before we start this story ,there is a quick warning thateveryone should take heed to avoid being cheated or deceived.

Ren Fu Collections just got news that fraudsters are using RenFu Collections’ archaeological pictures and pictures of genuine old pots todeceive the public.

Please be informed that there is only one person(so far) inthis world that Ren Fu Collections trust and allow to use our pictures andsells our pots.

Do check with Ren Fu Collections if you are not sure.

Here is today’s story titled:

HUANG QIAN LIANG:YOUR GUESS WORKS ARE RUNNINGWILD………………………………………………………………..

In the book titled “Appreciation of Zisha teapots”,printedon September 2004,Huang Qian Liang claimed ,we quote,”Hui Meng Chen was anearly Qing potter”.

That’s fantastic guess work!

Why fantastic guess work?

Firstly,because the book was written in collaboration withNanjing museum ,a prestigious Chinese institution and secondly ,there aretwenty nine archaeologically excavated teapots in it…..and the fact is museumsand archaeological excavations deal with truth only and nothing else. And Hui MengChen is a most important and famous old potter in the history of Zisha hu.

But what’s wrong with Huang Qian Liang’s fantastic guesswork?

Because now Huang Qian Liang changes his story: he says HuiMeng Chen was a late Ming potter.

Why Huang Qian Liang changes his story?

Because he found out there are proofs in the West that HuiMeng Chen was a late Ming potter.

But what does this prove about Huang Qian Liang?

This prove yet again-and there are many ,many more inconsistencies-that Huang Qian Liang is not a genuine scholar and cannot be relied on.

And you learners out there would do well to learn fromarchaeologically excavated pots rather than guess work artists like Huang QianLiang.(remember six out of ten pots we showed him in 2011, he guessed wrong ).

Remember to ask yourselves what is the purpose of learning?

Yes-to find out the truth!

Enjoy Ren Fu Collections archaeological posting.

P/S..Ren Fu Collections has bought thirteen books written byHuang Qian Liang and we found only two books worth learning from or worth buying.

The rest of Huang Qian Liang’s books contained half truths ,halfbaked ideas ,inconsistencies and some-down right fraudulent….all cemented byguess works.

But the most serious thing about his books is they containedfake Zisha hus.

FU COLLECTIONS INVENTORY SHEET
1) OBJECT TYPE : YIXING TEAPOT
2) INVENTORY NO: 463
3) DESCRIPTION: GUANG HUO
4) PERIOD/DATE ：REFER TO WEBSITE.
5) PLACE OF ORIGIN: YIXING CHINA.
6) ARTIST/MAKER: UNKNOWN
7) MATERIAL: PURPLE CLAY
8) FINDSPOT: CLASSIFIED
9) FINDDATE: CLASSIFIED
10) DIMENSIONS: HT-REFER TO YIXING WARES OF EARLY QING DYNASTY FOUND IN NANYANG
11) BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES: REFER TO YIXING WARES OF EARLY QING DYNASTY FOUNDIN NANYANG
12) ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMMENT: REFER TO WEBSITE

13)EXPERT COMMENT: REFER TO WEBSITE

在我们这个故事开始之前，有一个快速的警告，每个人都应该注意避免被欺骗。

任富收藏刚收到消息称，欺诈者正在使用任富收藏品的考古老紫砂壶图片和真实老壶的图片来欺骗公众。

请注意，在这个世界上只有一个人（到目前为止），任富收藏信任并允许使用我们的照片并出售我们的紫砂壶。

如果您不确定，请与任富收藏联系。谢谢！

这是今天的故事题目：

黄健亮：你的猜测工作正在野蛮奔跑.........................................

黄健亮在2004年9月出版的《砂壶汇赏》一书中，引用“惠孟臣是清早期的老名家”。

这是非常好的猜测工作！

为什么他的猜测工作了不起呢？

首先，由于这本书是与南京博物馆合作编写的，是中国有名望的中国机构；其次仅有二十九把考古发掘的宜兴茶壶，事实上博物馆和考古发掘只提真相，没有别的。在历史里面“惠孟臣”是一位最重要最出名的老名家。

但是黄健亮的猜测工作有什么问题呢？

因为现在黄健亮改变了他的故事，他说：“惠孟臣是一位晚明的陶匠。

为什么黄健亮改变他的故事？

因为他发现在西方有证据，惠孟臣是一个晚明的老名家。

但是，这对黄健亮有什么证明呢？

这再次证明，黄健亮不是一个真正的学者，不能依赖，而且有许多更多的不一致地方。

你们跟着他学习的人，最好的要从考古挖掘的茶壶里学习，而不是靠猜测的艺术术家，像黄健亮（记得我在2011年给他看的十把壶里面有六把壶鉴定错。）

记住要问自己，学习的目的是什么？

是的 ，找出茶壶的真相！

享受任富收藏考古发帖。

P / S：任富收藏购买了黄健亮十三本书，发现只有两本值得学习或值得购买的书籍。

其余的黄健亮的书籍包含了一半的真相，一半的猜测想法，不一致和一些欺骗性...，都被猜测作品粘住了。

但他最重要的是他的书包含了假紫砂壶，没有道德性的教人和做你混乱。

任富收藏的考古记录：
(1)宝物类型：宜兴茶壶
(2)编号： 463
(3)描述：光货
(4)年代：看网址
(5)生产起源：中国宜兴
(6)名家作者：无
(7)原料：紫砂
(8)找到的地方：机密
(9)找到的时间：机密
(10)尺寸：参考《海丝茶烟》书籍
(11)文献证明书：参考《海丝茶烟》书籍
(12)考古的评论：看网址
(13)专家的评论：看网址。

壶之铭

清三代器，好壶！