思亭壶的故事

任富收藏

ITS VERYSTRANGE WHY REN FU COLLECTIONS’ ARCHAEOLOGICALLY EXCAVATED ZISHA HUS DO NOTHAVE EVEN ONE LU SI TING INSCRIBEDPOT?....................................................................................

Tony Rencalls Lu Si Ting” a specialist in mono-art pot”.

Here is ourtake and because we don’t know the potter was a male or female-the ambiguouspronoun he/she is used instead:

Lu SiTingwas an extremely one-minded potter. He/She not only made one shape of pot –he/shemade one size, one clay, signed his/her name in one spot under the handle ofthe pot and most likely only the first names.

Yes, to thelast claim Ren Fu Collections’ have archaeological proofs that all our 34 SiTing pots have the First names Si Ting as signatures on the pots.(Why, we don’tknow but how come we have many Lu Si Ting inscribed late Qing pots in our 4tth thousand pots?)

And ,yes,its very strange that, out there, in the market there are fully inscribe Lu SiTing pots

Yes, outthere…..in the chaotic , as all of us know by now, unreliable and untrustworthyworld of old Zisha hu that’s flooded by fakes and corrupted by fraudsters.

We thinkthese fully- inscribed Lu Si Ting  Zhunihus are fakes or late Qing  oldcopies.(Like the late Qing copy in the book titled Appreciation Of ZishaTeapots)

And being aresponsible and truthful posting, we welcome any Zisha hu experts to challengeour bold statement.

Enjoy RenFu Collections’ archaeological posting.

P/s…Pleasenote that, in future, Ren Fu Collections’ postings will be configured into fourcategories:: Zisha hu related news and comments; Authentication; Archaeologicalexcavations and Ren Fu Collections’ archaeological discoveries.

We hopethis format will expedite  the learningof old Zisha hu.

By the way,do you all notice that Lu Si Ting: the potter did not do poems, calligraphy andhis/her penmanship was atrocious….so casual and bland for such a skillfulpotter.

REN FU COLLECTIONS INVENTORY SHEET：
1) OBJECT TYPE : YIXING TEAPOT
2) INVENTORY NO: 277
3) DESCRIPTION: GUANG HUO
4) PERIOD/DATE ：HT-REFER TO COMING 2ND BOOK.
5) PLACE OF ORIGIN: YIXING CHINA.
6) ARTIST/MAKER: LU SI TING
7) MATERIAL: PURPLE CLAY
8) FINDSPOT: CLASSIFIED
9) FINDDATE: CLASSIFIED
10) DIMENSIONS: HT-REFER TO COMING 2ND BOOK.
11) BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES: REFER TO COMING 2ND BOOK.
12) ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMMENT: REFER TO WEBSITE
13)EXPERT COMMENT: REFER TO WEBSITE

很奇怪，为什么任富收藏的考古没有“陆思亭”三个字的刻在思亭款紫砂壶………..

任汤尼叫陆思亭是“一个壶的艺术专家”。

这是我们的想法，因为我们不知道思亭是一个男性还是女性 - 使用他/她的模糊代词：

陆思亭是一个非常有意思的陶匠。他/她不仅制作了一个形状的壶，还制作了一个大小，一块泥土，只在一个地方签名，很可能只有“思亭”两个字的名字。

是的，对于任富收藏最后的要求，有考古证明，我们所有的34 把思亭款紫砂壶都刻有“思亭”两个字（为什么我们34把早清思亭款壶只有两个字签名，但是在我们第四个1000把壶里面有陆思亭款三个字签名的？）

是的，很奇怪的，为什么在市场上完全刻着陆思亭三个字的壶？

是的，在市场上... ..混乱中，正如我们现在所知道的，老紫砂壶不可靠和不可信赖的世界被假货淹沫，被欺诈者玷污。

我们相信在市场上的陆思亭款三个字的紫砂壶是假的或是晚晴的。

作为一个负责任，真实的职位，我们欢迎任何紫砂专家挑战我们的大胆声明，有什么大道理有什么不对。

享受任富收藏考古帖文。

P / s ：请注意，将来任富收藏的帖子将被分为四类：第一是关心紫砂壶相关新闻和评论;第二是鉴定认证;第三是考古发掘任何事物；第四是任富收藏考古发现。

我们希望这种格式能够加快对老紫砂壶的学习。

顺便说一句，你们都注意到陆思亭的壶：没有刻诗句，书法和他/她的笔法是枯燥的乏味......对于这样一个熟练的陶工来说，这个是休闲平淡的。

任富收藏的考古记录：
(1)宝物类型：宜兴茶壶
(2)编号：277
(3)描述：光货
(4)年代：看要出版的第二本书籍
(5)生产起源：中国宜兴
(6)名家作者：无
(7)原料：紫砂
(8)找到的地方：机密
(9)找到的时间：机密
(10)尺寸：看要出版的第二本书籍
(11)文献证明书：看要出版的第二本书籍
(12)考古的评论：看要出版的第二本书籍
(13)专家的评论：看网址。

壶之铭

出土器，好壶。