|
发表于 2008-10-24 20:28:19
|
显示全部楼层
<div class="msgheader">QUOTE:</div><div class="msgborder"><b>以下是引用<i>方壶斋</i>在2008-10-24 12:50:56的发言:</b><br/>
<div style="overflow: hidden; clear: both;"></div>
<img src="skins/Default/topicface/face1.gif" alt="发贴心情"/> 方壶斋 说:
<table style="table-layout: fixed;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td background="images/dispbbs/top_l.gif" width="35" height="15">
</td><td background="images/dispbbs/top_c.gif" height="15">
</td><td background="images/dispbbs/top_r.gif" width="16">
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td background="images/dispbbs/center_l.gif" valign="top">
</td>
<td>
<div>许氏为行有恒堂主人载铨门生,又任盐官,订制名手作壶以赠师友应顺理成章.汲园主人俟考,但从落款方式看甚为恭敬.款字稍板可能是按订制墨稿摹刻所致,个人认为可归入曼生壶余脉.
</div>
<br/>
</td>
<td background="images/dispbbs/center_r.gif">
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td background="images/dispbbs/foot_l.gif" height="20">
</td><td background="images/dispbbs/foot_c.gif">
</td><td background="images/dispbbs/foot_r.gif">
</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p></p>這點說法倒是可以接受,可見出清中以降文人壶的影響...<br/><br/> |
|