|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-5-16 12:27:12
|
显示全部楼层
<div class="msgheader">QUOTE:</div><div class="msgborder"><b>以下是引用<i>怡陶</i>在2010-5-4 4:33:35的发言:</b><br/>
<table style="TABLE-LAYOUT: fixed; WORD-BREAK: break-all" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="35" background="images/dispbbs/top_l.gif" height="15">
<td background="images/dispbbs/top_c.gif" height="15">
<td width="16" background="images/dispbbs/top_r.gif"></td>
<tr>
<td valign="top" background="images/dispbbs/center_l.gif"></td>
<td>
<div>樓主冶學精神令人感佩<br/>以下就此壺幾點個人意見供參<br/>照片顏色多種,不易判斷,且土沁未清,色多偏淡<br/>綜多圖與觀把觀底肌理發色,個人感覺此壺為朱砂胎調砂機會大些<br/>其二<br/>此型為龍蛋體<br/>清初龍蛋此型已走向成熟穩定模式,器身渾圓似蛋體.流多作短肥椎狀以呼應壺身<br/>反觀明末型制身較高瘦.流較長伸<br/>其三<br/>觀此印熟玩老壺的朋友應可較靠晚明評斷(可參荊溪紫砂器p27潘秀如款調砂壺)<br/>這種印款乃明代砂壺常用印法<br/>至清一朝漸走規整<br/>================================================<br/>樓主應是玩壺前輩<br/>此壺不觀底款,確實保守觀之隻能評明末清初<br/>底款一觀,如播雲見日<br/>另此壺因尚未清理,故難度提升<br/>相信清洗泡養後.會更鮮明<br/>一孔之見,供參 </div><br/></td>
<td background="images/dispbbs/center_r.gif"></td>
<tr>
<td background="images/dispbbs/foot_l.gif" height="20">
<td background="images/dispbbs/foot_c.gif">
<td background="images/dispbbs/foot_r.gif"></td>
<div style="CLEAR: both; OVERFLOW: hidden"></div><img alt="發貼心情" src="http://www.zghmbbs.com/skins/Default/topicface/face1.gif"/> 怡陶 說: </tr></tbody></table></div>
<p>怡陶兄的观点是做学问的 向您学习 <br/></p> |
|